To measure the statistical significance of associations between a list of selected DEGs and a specific gene set (e.g., a group of genes in a KEGG pathway), the Gscore method evaluates the enrichment of coexpressed gene pairs between all the DEGs of the selected list and all the DEGs in the collection of gene sets (e.g., gene sets for 347 KEGG human pathways) based on the hypergeometric distribution with Benjamini–Hochberg correction. The process details are as follows:
(1). For each input gene expression dataset with samples belonging to two classes, we first identified the DEGs between control and case samples. Then, we constructed a coexpression network using the expression profiles of the case samples, in which two DEGs with a
Pearson correlation coefficient (|Pearson’s r|) ≥ c across case samples were considered a coexpressed gene pair. Here, c can be set by the user, for example, to
0.3 (low), 0.5 (moderate), or 0.7 (high). Note that genes with identical expression values across all “case” samples are ignored when calculating the correlation.
(2). For each DEG in the query list, Gscore
1 first uses the coexpressed gene pairs between that DEG and all the DEGs of a gene set in the selected collection to determine the association significance for this gene set based on the
hypergeometric distribution2,3,4 as follows:
where
m and
n are, respectively, the numbers of coexpressed gene pairs and all possible gene pairs between each DEG in the query DEG list and all the DEGs in a specific gene set; for instance, the values for
m and
n between
DEG a and
Gene Set A (containing 5 DEGs) in
Figure A are 3 (red dotted lines) and 5, respectively.
M and
N are, respectively, the total numbers of all the coexpressed gene pairs and all possible gene pairs between each DEG in the query DEG list and all the DEGs in the gene sets of the selected collection. The
FDR q value for multiple hypothesis testing with the Benjamini–Hochberg method was used, and the false discovery rate was controlled at 5%. Here, the association between the DEG in the query DEG list and a certain gene set was considered statistically significant
when its q value was ≤ 0.05.
(3). For the query DEG list, Gscore1 further measured the statistical significance of association for a specific gene set based on the coexpressed gene pairs between all of the involved DEGs and all the DEGs of this gene set in the selected collection (Figure B). Then, we computed the p value of the hypergeometric distribution2,3,4 as
where mg and ng are, respectively, the numbers of coexpressed gene pairs and all the possible gene pairs, respectively, between all the DEGs of the query list and all the DEGs in a specific gene set; for example, mg (i.e., observed coexpressed gene pairs; red dotted lines) and ng between List i (including 7 involved DEGs) and Gene Set A (containing 5 DEGs) in Figure B are 6 and 35, respectively. Mg and Ng are, respectively, the total numbers of all the coexpressed gene pairs and all possible gene pairs between all the DEGs of the query list and all the DEGs of gene sets in the selected collection.
(4). Here, the association between the query DEG list and a certain gene set was considered statistically significant when its
FDR q value was ≤ 0.05 (Benjamini–Hochberg correction
5).
Reference:
1.Chang, L. Y. ,Lee, M.Z., et al. Gene set correlation enrichment analysis for interpreting and annotating gene expression profiles.
Nucleic Acids Res 52, Page e17.
2. Bandyopadhyay, S., et al. Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage.
Science 330, 1385-1389
(2010).
3. Lin, C.Y., Lin, Y.W., Yu, S.W., Lo, Y.S. & Yang, J.M. MoNetFamily: a web server to infer homologous modules and module-module interaction networks in vertebrates.
Nucleic Acids
Res 40, W263-W270 (2012).
4. Lin, C. Y., et al. Membrane protein-regulated networks across human cancers.
Nature Commun 10, 3131
(2019).
5. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate-a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.
J. R. Stat.
Soc. B Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).